AI Visibility Index: Singapore Coworking Brands – 2026 Multi-Platform Edition

We tracked 35 coworking brands across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview using Peec. Updated rankings, methodology timeline, platform comparison, and citation landscape.
Published:
Updated:

Key Takeaways

  • 35 coworking brands were tracked across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview March–April 2026.
  • 25 prompts spanning 6 intent categories were tested, including a new Premium Coworking topic added for V2.
  • WeWork overtook JustCo as the most visible coworking brand in AI search, with 19% visibility and 18% share of voice.
  • The Great Room and The Executive Centre vaulted into the top 4, driven by premium editorial positioning and third-party citations.
  • Only 13 out of 35 brands achieved meaningful AI visibility of 3% or above.
  • The top 3 brands held approximately 43% of all AI visibility, leaving a long, empty tail for the remaining 32 brands.

In December 2025, we published the first AI Visibility Index for Singapore's coworking market, tracking how 32 brands appeared (or didn't) across AI-powered search. That edition used a single AI model, on a single day. It was a proof of concept.

This is the V2 edition. 35 brands, tracked across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview using Peec, with daily monitoring over 8 days. New metrics. New categories. And a leaderboard that reshuffled from top to bottom.

What Changed Between V1 and V2?

Version When Brands Platforms Tracking Key Addition
V1 December 2025 32 GPT-5 API only Single-day snapshot First-of-its-kind study
V1.1 January 2026 32 GPT-5 API only Single-day snapshot Validation re-run
V2 March–April 2026 35 ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overview 8-day daily tracking SOV metric, Premium topic

V1 proved the concept: AI search visibility could be measured and ranked. Single-model data has a blind spot, though. A brand that dominates on ChatGPT may be completely invisible on Perplexity. Multi-platform tracking reveals the full picture, and the gaps most brands don't know they have.

How Do We Measure AI Visibility?

Four metrics define each brand's AI search profile:

Metric What It Measures Scale
Visibility Percentage of AI responses mentioning the brand across all 3 platforms 0–100%
Share of Voice (SOV) Brand's share of total mentions vs. all competitors. Measures relative dominance. New in V2. 0–100%
Sentiment How positively AI describes the brand when it appears, based on language and context around mentions 0–100
Position Average rank when mentioned. Lower is better. #2.0 means the brand is typically listed second. #1.0+

How Was This Study Conducted?

We tracked 35 coworking and flexible workspace operators in Singapore across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview over an 8-day period (29 March – 5 April 2026), powered by Peec.

25 prompts were tested across 6 intent categories:

  1. Workspace Selection & Comparison: Broad queries about finding and comparing coworking options
  2. Cost, Contracts & Negotiation: Pricing, lease terms, and deal-related queries
  3. Hybrid Work Strategy & Policies: Corporate hybrid/remote work planning queries
  4. Productivity & Team Culture: Queries about workspace impact on team performance
  5. Local & On-Demand Logistics: Day-pass, hot desk, and short-term access queries
  6. Premium & Enterprise Workspace: Queries specifically targeting high-end, hospitality-grade workspace (new in V2)

Prompts were designed to reflect real buyer search behaviour, from individual freelancers to enterprise teams evaluating regional headquarters. Examples:

  • "Compare premium coworking options in Singapore suitable for a 120-person regional HQ team"
  • "How can I structure a mix of hot desks and private offices to keep costs low for my 20-person startup"
  • "Best premium coworking spaces in Singapore CBD for client meetings"

Performance varies based on a brand's specific positioning and target audience. Brands focused on niche segments (e.g. premium-only or enterprise-only) may appear less frequently in broad consumer queries while performing strongly in their target segment. The Premium Coworking topic was added specifically to capture this dynamic.

All data was collected from publicly accessible AI tools. No proprietary or private analytics were used.

What Did We Find?

Six key findings emerged from the V2 data. Each one reveals a different dimension of how AI tools are reshaping coworking brand visibility in Singapore.

1. The market is a power law

The top 3 brands hold approximately 43% of all AI visibility. The top 7 account for over 75%. Below rank 13, visibility drops to near zero. This is a handful of brands and a long, empty tail.

2. WeWork took the crown

WeWork climbed from a tied 3rd in V1 to outright #1 in V2, with 19% visibility and 18% share of voice. Extensive third-party editorial coverage and strong domain authority across all three AI platforms drove the rise.

3. Premium brands surged

The Great Room jumped from #6 to #3. The Executive Centre vaulted from #9 to #4. Both brands have invested in premium positioning and editorial presence, and the multi-platform methodology rewarded that. When AI tools recommend "best premium coworking," these brands are now consistently named.

4. Spaces collapsed, and the data explains why

Spaces fell from #2 in V1 (91.3% visibility on GPT-5 alone) to #33 in V2 with 0% visibility across all three platforms. There is a caveat: V1 didn't apply strict regex filtering for brand names, and "Spaces" is a generic word that could match non-brand mentions in AI responses. V2 applied proper regex matching. The collapse is likely a combination of the multi-platform methodology change and cleaner data extraction, though even accounting for potential V1 inflation, the drop is significant.

5. Premium intent flips the rankings

When prompts specifically target premium coworking buyers, the leaderboard reshuffles entirely. The Executive Centre leads with 80% visibility, more than double WeWork's 39%. The Great Room, Servcorp, and The Work Project all outperform their overall rankings on premium queries. The brands that own the premium conversation are different from the brands that lead the general one.

6. AI reads a very narrow set of sources

The top 5 retrieved domains account for the vast majority of all citations. Listicle-format content on third-party sites is the primary gateway. One listicle from Sleek alone was retrieved 60 times. Brands that don't appear in these listicles are largely invisible to AI tools, regardless of their own website quality.

Which Brands Lead the Overall AI Visibility Rankings?

WeWork leads with 19% visibility and 18% share of voice, the highest on both metrics across all 35 brands. JustCo and The Great Room follow at 12% each, with The Executive Centre close behind at 11%. Below rank 13, visibility drops below 3%, making brands functionally invisible in AI search.

Tracked across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview. 25 prompts, 8-day daily average. Ranked by visibility.

Rank Brand Visibility SOV Sentiment Position Category
1 WeWork 19% 18% 64 #2.0 SME & Startup
2 JustCo 12% 13% 70 #3.0 SME & Startup
3 The Great Room 12% 12% 75 #2.9 Enterprise & Premium
4 The Executive Centre 11% 9% 70 #2.8 Enterprise & Premium
5 Servcorp 9% 7% 66 #3.2 Enterprise & Premium
6 Regus 8% 5% 64 #3.2 Traditional Flex
7 The Work Project 6% 5% 68 #3.5 Enterprise & Premium
8 The Hive 5% 4% 71 #3.7 SME & Startup
9 The Working Capitol 4% 3% 70 #3.4 SME & Startup
10 Switch 4% 2% 55 #1.0 Individual & On-Demand
Industry Average (all 35) ~3% ~3% ~67 #3.4

Below rank 10, visibility drops to 0–2%, functionally invisible to buyers using AI search. Notable: Spaces, once ranked #2 in V1, sits at rank 33 with 0% visibility.

Where does your brand sit? Most operators we've spoken to don't know.

How Did Rankings Shift from V1 to V2?

The biggest movers tell the story of what multi-platform tracking reveals. The Executive Centre gained 5 ranks (the largest positive movement), while Spaces collapsed from #2 to #33 (the largest negative movement).

Brand V1 Rank (Dec '25) V2 Rank (Apr '26) Movement
WeWork =3rd 1st 🔺 +2
JustCo 1st 2nd 🔻 -1
The Great Room 6th 3rd 🔺 +3
The Executive Centre 9th 4th 🔺 +5
Servcorp 5th 5th ↔ Held
Regus =3rd 6th 🔻 -3
The Work Project Not in top 10 7th 🔺 New entry
The Working Capitol 7th 9th 🔻 -2
Compass Offices 8th Below top 13 🔻 Dropped
Deskimo 10th 13th 🔻 -3
Spaces 2nd 33rd (0%) 🔻 Collapsed

What's driving the shifts?

The biggest factor is the move from single-model to multi-platform. V2 also applied stricter regex matching for brand name extraction, particularly relevant for Spaces, a generic word that may have inflated V1 results with non-brand matches. Conversely, enterprise brands like The Executive Centre and The Great Room, which have stronger editorial footprints and third-party citations, gained ground when measured across all three platforms.

Which Brands Does AI Recommend at Each Stage of the Buyer Journey?

AI recommendations shift dramatically depending on where the buyer is in the funnel. WeWork is the only brand that appears consistently across all four stages. On-demand platforms dominate awareness but vanish at the decision stage, while premium brands are invisible early but surge when buyers narrow their search.

V2 categorises prompts into four intent stages, mirroring how a real buyer moves from "I'm exploring" to "I'm ready to sign."

Funnel Stage #1 #2 #3 #4
Awareness – "What's out there?" Switch (7.0%) WeWork (6.3%) workbuddy (3.3%) Deskimo (3.3%)
Consideration – "Compare my options" WeWork (28.5%) JustCo (26.0%) The Great Room (24.7%) The Executive Centre (17.7%)
Evaluation – "Which is best for me?" WeWork (48.5%) The Great Room (30.0%) Servcorp (27.2%) JustCo (27.2%)
Decision – "I'm ready to act" WeWork (14.0%) Servcorp (12.8%) The Executive Centre (10.4%) Regus (9.7%)

Key patterns

Switch, workbuddy, and Deskimo dominate awareness but vanish lower in the funnel. These on-demand platforms appear when users first explore options, but AI tools stop recommending them when queries become more specific or transactional.

The Great Room and The Executive Centre are invisible at the awareness stage (0%) but surge in consideration and evaluation. AI treats them as premium options surfaced only when buyers narrow their search. This is exactly how premium brands want to be positioned.

WeWork is the only brand that appears consistently across all four stages. From awareness through to decision, it maintains top-4 presence at every step. This cross-funnel consistency is a significant competitive advantage.

Servcorp and Regus dominate the decision stage. When AI tools generate responses for high-intent, ready-to-sign queries, these established enterprise brands surface most reliably.

Which Brands Dominate Premium AI Search Queries?

The Executive Centre dominates with 80% premium visibility, appearing in 4 out of 5 premium AI responses. This is more than double WeWork's 39% on the same queries. The premium rankings tell a completely different story from the overall leaderboard.

V2 introduces a dedicated Premium Coworking topic: 5 prompts specifically targeting buyers searching for premium, hospitality-grade workspace in Singapore's CBD.

Premium Rank Brand Premium Visibility Premium SOV Premium Sentiment Premium Position Overall Rank
1 The Executive Centre 80% 16% 73 #2.7 4th
2 The Great Room 57% 16% 80 #2.8 3rd
3 Servcorp 54% 11% 73 #3.4 5th
4 The Work Project 46% 10% 74 #3.2 7th
5 JustCo 41% 9% 71 #4.5 2nd
6 WeWork 39% 8% 68 #3.3 1st
7 Regus 39% 8% 69 #4.0 6th
8 Arcc Spaces 36% 8% 76 #3.2 11th

What the premium data reveals

The Great Room holds the highest premium sentiment (80). This is the only brand in the entire dataset to hit 80 on any metric. AI tools don't just mention The Great Room on premium queries; they describe it more positively than any competitor.

WeWork is #1 overall but drops to #6 on premium. JustCo is #2 overall but #5 on premium. Neither brand's general-market dominance translates to premium-intent queries. AI tools recognise them as major coworking operators but don't position them as premium choices.

Arcc Spaces makes the strongest case for niche strategy. Ranked #11 overall with 4% visibility, it jumps to #8 on premium queries with 36% visibility and the second-highest premium sentiment (76). The gap between its overall and premium performance is the widest of any brand. AI tools understand Arcc Spaces' positioning even if they rarely surface it in broad queries.

A single blog post fuelled TEC's premium lead. A blog post on The Executive Centre's own site about premium workspaces in Singapore was one of the most-retrieved URLs in the entire citation dataset (31 retrievals, 1.5 citation rate).

What Sources Do AI Tools Actually Read?

Competitor websites are the #1 source type, and listicle-format content on third-party sites is the primary gateway for brand recommendations. Understanding what AI reads is as important as understanding what it says, because if your brand isn't in the sources, it won't be in the answers.

Top Retrieved Domains

Rank Domain Retrieval Share Type
1 servcorp.com.sg 20.5% Competitor site
2 wework.com 16.8% Competitor site
3 work-buddy.com 16.7% Competitor site (marketplace)
4 reddit.com 15.3% UGC / Community
5 linkedin.com 13.8% Professional / Social

Key observations:

  • Competitor websites are the #1 source type. Servcorp, WeWork, and workbuddy's own domains are cited more than any third-party editorial. Brands with strong, crawlable websites have a structural advantage in AI search.
  • Reddit is the 4th most-retrieved domain. AI tools treat Reddit threads as authentic, high-signal user-generated content. Brands discussed positively on Reddit benefit; brands absent from it lose a major citation pathway.
  • LinkedIn is a citation source. It is the only social platform that registers in AI retrievals. Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook are completely absent.
  • The Great Room's own site (thegreatroom.co) accounts for just 1.8% of retrievals, despite the brand ranking #3 overall. The Great Room's visibility is almost entirely recommendation-driven: AI tools recommend it based on what other sources say. Impressive, but fragile.
  • JustCo's site (justcoglobal.com) accounts for just 3.5% of retrievals, similarly recommendation-dependent despite ranking #2.

Top 10 Retrieved URLs

These are the individual pages AI tools cited most frequently when answering coworking queries about Singapore.

# Source Type Retrievals Cit. Rate Brands Featured
1 Sleek – "7 Best Coworking Spaces In Singapore" Listicle 60 1.6 JustCo, The Great Room, WeWork, The Hive, The Working Capitol
2 SassyMama – "18 Best Shared Offices & Coworking Spaces" Listicle 48 1.1 18 brands incl. The Great Room, JustCo, Servcorp, WeWork
3 Servcorp Blog – "Cost of Coworking vs Traditional Offices" Comparison 43 0.6 Servcorp
4 Workthere – "15 Best Coworking Spaces in Singapore" Listicle 42 0.5 11 brands incl. Servcorp, Arcc Spaces, WeWork, The Great Room, The Executive Centre
5 WeWork – "Coworking Space Singapore" (brand page) Brand Page 36 0.8 WeWork
6 TASA Trust – "Best Coworking Spaces Singapore 2026" Listicle 34 1.0 WeWork, JustCo, The Great Room, The Hive, Regus
7 FlySpaces – "Top 7 Coolest Coworking in Singapore CBD" Listicle 34 0.3 The Hive, The Executive Centre, Regus
8 workbuddy Blog – "Top 5 Coworking Spaces for Teams" Listicle 34 1.2 workbuddy, WeWork, The Executive Centre, Regus
9 SmileTutor – "Top 5 Best Coworking Spaces" Listicle 33 1.0 WeWork, JustCo, The Working Capitol, The Great Room
10 The Executive Centre Blog – "Premium Coworking Spaces Singapore CBD" Brand Blog 31 1.5 The Executive Centre

7 out of 10 of the most-retrieved URLs are listicles. The top listicle (Sleek) alone was retrieved 60 times, nearly double the next-highest URL. The only non-listicles in the top 10 are a cost comparison article on Servcorp's blog (#3), WeWork's own brand page (#5), and The Executive Centre's premium coworking blog post (#10).

The Executive Centre's blog post is notable: it's the only brand-owned editorial content in the top 10, and it has the highest citation rate (1.5). When AI retrieves it, it actually cites it in the response. This single post is a significant driver of TEC's #1 premium ranking.

What Gets Retrieved: Content Type Breakdown (1,000 URLs)

We analysed the content type of all 1,000 URLs retrieved by AI tools across the tracking period.

Content Type Share of URLs What AI Uses It For
Listicles ("Best X" roundups) ~30% The #1 gateway. "Best coworking spaces in Singapore" roundups dominate retrievals. 7 of the top 10 most-retrieved URLs are listicles.
How-To Guides ~26% Procedural content: "how to stay focused," "how to choose a coworking space," "how to negotiate lease terms." High volume, moderate citation rates.
Comparisons ~13% "Coworking vs traditional office," cost breakdowns, head-to-head format. Strong for evaluation-stage queries.
Articles / Thought Leadership ~9% Industry analysis, market trends, and research. Lower retrieval frequency but high authority when cited.
Brand Pages (category, product, homepage) ~12% Direct brand content: pricing pages, location directories, product pages. Servcorp and WeWork dominate this category.
UGC / Discussion (Reddit, forums) ~3% Authentic user opinions. Reddit threads are treated as high-signal by AI models despite low volume.
Profiles / Reviews ~2% Individual location or brand profiles on directory sites.
Other / Unclassified ~5% Mixed format content or pages that couldn't be categorised.

The takeaway: Listicles and how-to guides together account for over 55% of all URLs retrieved by AI tools. Listicles punch far above their weight in actual retrieval volume. They make up ~30% of URLs but account for over 70% of the top-10 retrievals. If your brand isn't in the right listicles, AI tools simply don't have the raw material to recommend you.

What AI Ignores

  • Google Reviews: Not crawled by AI tools. A brand with 1,000 five-star reviews gets zero benefit in AI search.
  • Instagram / TikTok / Facebook: Not cited. Visual-first content is invisible to language models.
  • Paid search (SEM): AI tools do not cite paid placements. Google Ads spend has no influence on AI-generated answers.
  • Property listing portals: Most commercial listing sites don't appear in AI citations for coworking queries.
If your coworking brand's entire online presence lives on Google Reviews, Instagram, and SEM, AI tools have nothing to work with.

The Content Gap

Brands absent from top-performing listicles are structurally disadvantaged. AI tools rely heavily on consolidated, comparison-format articles when generating coworking recommendations. If a brand isn't featured in the listicles that AI retrieves most frequently, it's unlikely to appear in AI-generated answers, regardless of how good its own website is.

The flip side: brands that appear in just one or two high-retrieval listicles can punch well above their weight. Getting into the right third-party content is often more impactful than producing more of your own.

Where Does Your Brand Rank?

This report covers 35 brands across 25 prompts on 3 AI platforms. It's a market-level view.

Our full AI visibility audit goes deeper, tracking your brand across 50+ custom prompts built around your specific audience, service lines, and competitive landscape, with actionable recommendations for improving your AI search presence.

Get your complimentary 7-day AI visibility snapshot → Book a call

Published by Underscore. Data powered by Peec. Updated April 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

How quickly can we improve AI visibility if we're currently at 0%?

It depends on your starting point. Brands with no online editorial presence or third-party mentions typically need 3–6 months of consistent content and citation-building to register in AI responses. Brands with existing content assets that simply aren't optimised for AI retrieval can see movement in 4–8 weeks.

Does AI visibility replace traditional SEO?

No. It adds a new layer. Traditional SEO targets search engine results pages. AI visibility targets the answers generated by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview. The two overlap (strong content helps both) but the optimisation tactics differ. Brands need both.

Why are the V2 numbers so different from V1?

V1 tested a single AI model (GPT-5) on a single day. V2 tracks three AI platforms over 8 days. Some brands that appeared frequently on GPT-5 alone (like Spaces) have no presence on Perplexity or Google AI Overview. The multi-platform methodology gives a more accurate picture, but it means the numbers can't be compared directly.

What type of content gets cited most by AI search tools?

Listicles account for approximately 30% of all retrieved URLs and over 70% of the top-10 most-retrieved pages. How-to guides are the second most common content type at 26%. Brand-owned content (pricing pages, location directories) accounts for about 12%, with Servcorp and WeWork dominating that category.

Can a brand improve its AI visibility without changing its website?

Yes. In this dataset, several high-ranking brands derive most of their AI visibility from third-party sources rather than their own websites. The Great Room's own domain accounts for just 1.8% of retrievals, yet it ranks #3 overall. Getting featured in high-retrieval listicles, building editorial mentions, and generating positive Reddit discussions can all improve AI visibility independently of website changes.

Keep Learning

AI SEO
17 Apr 26

Why Your Brand Doesn't Appear in ChatGPT (And How to Diagnose It)

Read Article
AI SEO
06 Apr 26

Is LinkedIn Really #1 for AI Citations? We Cross-Checked 6 Datasets

Read Article
AI SEO
28 Mar 26

Google AI Overviews: Everything You Need to Know in 2026

Read Article