AI Visibility Index: How AI Sees Singapore’s Coworking Brands

We analysed 25 real-world prompts to understand which of 32 workspace brands show up in AI answers today and which are quietly missing.

Last Updated: January 2, 2026

A report for AI Visibility Index for all Singapore coworking brands
In this article

Summary

When hybrid teams in Singapore ask AI for coworking recommendations, the answers are decided before the search begins. This study tested 32 coworking brands across 25 prompts in the GPT-5 model, capturing how AI selects and ranks workspace providers for critical buying decisions.

  • First, a small group of five brands—JustCo, Spaces, Regus, WeWork, and Servcorp—dominate AI visibility, appearing in over 80% of all scenarios and consistently ranking in top positions.
  • Second, on-demand access platforms like workbuddy, Deskimo, and Switch are over-represented relative to their physical footprint, capturing attention in flexibility-focused queries despite limited locations.
  • 13 of 32 brands (41%) achieve zero AI visibility despite having websites and market presence

In Singapore's competitive flexible workspace market, AI assistants act as the first filter for coworking decisions. Brands that fail to appear in these conversations lose enterprise teams, remote workers, and hybrid startups at the discovery stage.

Why AI Visibility Matters

Buying decisions for flexible workspace now begin in conversational AI. When HR leaders ask about hybrid policies, founders compare coworking costs, or remote workers search for focus spaces, AI assistants deliver curated shortlists before users ever open a browser.

  • Appearing in answers: Whether a brand is mentioned when relevant workspace questions are asked
  • Described positively: How favorable the sentiment and context are when the brand appears
  • Positioned in the shortlist: Where the brand ranks when AI actively recommends options

Brands absent from AI responses forfeit consideration to competitors who shape perceptions through tone, rank, and context before the first human interaction.

Who We Tested For

Hybrid Team Decision-Makers in Singapore
HR managers designing flexible office policies, startup founders balancing cost and culture, remote workers splitting time across home and coworking, and enterprise teams selecting HQ-grade serviced offices. These users ask AI for workspace comparisons, cost models, security best practices, and location logistics when traditional leases no longer fit distributed teams.​

What metrics we track?

The study covered five prompt themes: workspace selection and comparison, cost and contract negotiation, hybrid work strategy and policies, productivity and team culture, and local on-demand logistics. All prompts were tested using the GPT-5 model in December 2025.

Core Metrics:

  • Visibility: Percentage of prompts where the brand appears (0-100%)
  • Sentiment: How positive the language is when describing the brand, averaged across all mentions (Score 0-100)
  • Position: How early the brand appears when actively recommended in a list (Score 0-100, where higher = earlier placement)

These three dimensions combine to reveal which brands AI trusts, recommends positively, and positions prominently in workspace conversations.

What are the prompts used?

We classify the prompts into 5 main topics and these are some of the examples:

  • Workspace selection: "Compare premium coworking options in Singapore suitable for a 120 person regional HQ team"
  • Cost & contracts: "Estimate the total monthly cost of moving 50 staff from a traditional lease into coworking"
  • Hybrid strategy: "Help me design a flexible office strategy that mixes HQ space and coworking"
  • Productivity: "Recommend a weekly routine for a remote worker who splits time between home, coworking spaces and client meetings"
  • On-demand logistics: "Find affordable coworking or study spaces near my home MRT"

How we limit the test?

  • API versus chat interface: Results reflect GPT-5 API outputs and may differ slightly from consumer ChatGPT interface responses
  • Model-specific results: Visibility patterns are specific to GPT-5 and will vary across Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI models
  • Point-in-time snapshot: Data captured in December 2025 and subject to change as models retrain and operators update their online presence

Overall Leaderboard

AI Visibility Index for Singapore Coworking Brands

This leaderboard shows 10 of 32 brands tested. The remaining 22 brands have varying levels of visibility, with 13 recording zero AI presence. Visit our landing page to unlock the complete rankings, category breakdowns, and your brand's specific performance data.

Who are the top 10 brands?

Rank Brand Visibility Sentiment Position Category
1 JustCo 95.7% 88.4 94.1 SME & Startup Coworking
2 Spaces 91.3% 84.5 68.5 SME & Startup Coworking
3 Regus 87.0% 82.4 78.6 Enterprise & HQ-grade flex
4 WeWork 87.0% 83.2 75.0 SME & Startup Coworking
5 Servcorp 82.6% 80.8 75.6 Enterprise & HQ-grade flex
6 The Great Room 78.3% 85.1 72.6 Enterprise & HQ-grade flex
7 The Working Capitol 73.9% 83.8 57.9 SME & Startup Coworking
8 Compass Offices 65.2% 82.3 52.2 Enterprise & HQ-grade flex
9 The Executive Centre 60.9% 85.1 76.9 Enterprise & HQ-grade flex
10 Deskimo 43.5% 86.8 70.8 Individual & On-Demand Access


JustCo dominates AI visibility with 96% reach and 94.1 position score, ranking first in 13 of 25 prompts. Spaces, Regus, and WeWork maintain strong breadth (87-91% visibility) but trail JustCo by 19-26 points in position, showing AI treats them as alternatives. Premium operators like The Executive Centre and The Great Room earn highest sentiment (85.1) but face visibility gaps of 22-39%, missing cost and hybrid policy conversations.​

Top 10 coworking brands in Singapore for AI Visibility via ChatGPT

22 additional brands were tested. Visit our landing page to see the complete rankings and category breakdowns.

Category Deep Dives

Enterprise & HQ-Grade Flex

Brand Visibility Sentiment Position
Regus 87.0% 82.4 78.6
Servcorp 82.6% 80.8 75.6
The Great Room 78.3% 85.1 72.6
Compass Offices 65.2% 82.3 52.2
The Executive Centre 60.9% 85.1 76.9


Key Insights:

  • Regus achieves enterprise category leadership with 87% visibility and balanced scores across sentiment (82.4) and position (78.6), making it the AI default for HQ infrastructure queries​
  • The Executive Centre earns highest sentiment (85.1) and strong position (76.9) but misses 39% of enterprise prompts, losing reach in cost-focused and hybrid strategy conversations where Regus and Servcorp dominate​
  • Servcorp appears in 83% of prompts but receives only 63% positive mentions (lowest rate in top 5), with AI flagging premium pricing as a trade-off in 7 of 19 appearances​

Brands not shown: The Work Project, Arcc Spaces, CEO SUITE, Csuites, Lionsworld Business Centre, and N9 Offices did not achieve sufficient AI visibility in this study. For the complete Enterprise & HQ-grade Flex category rankings, visit our landing page.

SME & Startup Coworking

Brand Visibility Sentiment Position
JustCo 95.7% 88.4 94.1
Spaces 91.3% 84.5 68.5
WeWork 87.0% 83.2 75.0
The Working Capitol 73.9% 83.8 57.9
Paperwork 39.1% 81.7 36.5


Key Insights:

  • JustCo dominates with 96% visibility and 94.1 position score, ranking first in 13 of 25 prompts and appearing in nearly every startup workspace conversation​
  • Spaces and WeWork maintain strong visibility above 87% but position scores 19-26 points lower than JustCo, showing AI treats them as secondary alternatives rather than default choices​
  • The Working Capitol appears in 74% of prompts with positive sentiment (83.8) but lowest position score (57.9), limiting impact to community and culture queries rather than workspace selection decisions​

Brands not shown: Core Collective, The Hive, Trehaus, MOX, CoWorkSpace, Crane, NexGen Office, O2Work, The Co., The Workshop, and UClub did not achieve sufficient AI visibility in this study. For the full SME & Startup Coworking rankings, visit our landing page.

Individual & On-Demand Access

Brand Visibility Sentiment Position
Deskimo 43.5% 86.8 70.8
Staytion 4.3% 85.0 61.5
Switch 4.3% 85.0 84.6


Key Insights:

  • Deskimo captures 43% of prompts with highest sentiment in the category (86.8) and ranks first in 4 prompts, but still misses 57% of logistics and on-demand conversations​
  • Workbuddy and Switch achieve excellent position scores (92.3 and 84.6) when mentioned but appear in only 1 prompt each (4.3% visibility), indicating AI recognizes niche utility but rarely triggers them organically​
  • Category-wide visibility crisis: even the leader (Deskimo) appears in less than half of relevant prompts, while 60% of brands (Staytion, Spatial Collective) achieve zero AI presence​

Brands not shown: Staytion and Spatial Collective did not achieve sufficient AI visibility in this study. Visit our landing page to explore the full Individual & On-Demand Access category.​

Summary of Study Insights

Singapore's coworking market is bifurcated in AI responses. JustCo, Spaces, Regus, and WeWork dominate breadth (appearing in 87-96% of prompts), while premium operators like The Executive Centre and The Great Room earn higher sentiment but face visibility gaps that limit enterprise reach. On-demand platforms struggle with brand recall, appearing only when queries explicitly mention app-based booking or flexible access.​

Our Perspective: AI visibility is not a popularity contest. It reflects how well your brand's digital footprint, category positioning, and value propositions align with the way AI models parse and rank information. Brands absent from 60-100% of relevant conversations lose teams at the discovery stage, before features, pricing, or location ever enter consideration.​

Brands will need to optimize for AI retrieval by strengthening structured data, clarifying category fit in indexed content, and building semantic relevance around buyer questions AI already answers. Visibility, sentiment, and position are the new metrics that determine which workspace providers shape hybrid work decisions in Singapore.​

Partner With Us

We help brands build AI visibility through strategic content, structured data optimization, and AEO measurement. Our service delivers prompt-level tracking, competitor benchmarking, and content roadmaps that close visibility gaps and improve sentiment and position scores. The value compounds as your brand appears earlier, more often, and more positively in the buying conversations that matter.​

Ready to own your category in AI search? Let's build your AI visibility strategy together.

the author
Zhiliang Chen
Founder of Underscore. Zhiliang leads the team with his expertise in web strategy and design. He believes that the future of brands lies in clarity, design intelligence, and confidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How quickly can we improve our AI visibility if we're currently at 0%?

It depends on your starting point. If you have strong brand signals but they're not structured properly—like press coverage, reviews, or location pages that AI can't parse—you can see movement in 4-6 weeks through content optimization and structured data fixes. If your digital footprint is thin, expect 3-6 months to build the content foundation that AI models need to understand your positioning and start recommending you. The advantage: once you're visible, the effect compounds as more users interact with AI answers that mention you.

Q2: Does AI visibility replace traditional SEO?

No, it extends it. Traditional SEO still drives traffic to your website when users click through from search results or AI citations. But AI visibility addresses a different problem: when buyers ask ChatGPT or Perplexity to "compare coworking options," they're getting an answer without ever seeing a search results page. If your brand isn't in that answer, you've lost the opportunity before the click happens. Think of AI visibility as the new top-of-funnel—it determines whether you're considered at all, while SEO determines whether you win the click once someone knows you exist.

Q3: Should we optimize for ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI separately?

Start with the patterns that work across all three, then refine. Clear positioning, structured location data, consistent brand messaging, and content that directly answers buyer questions improve visibility across models. Once you've established baseline visibility (15-30% across key prompts), you can optimize for model-specific behaviors—ChatGPT favors detailed explanations, Perplexity prioritizes recency and citations, Google AI Overviews lean on existing search authority. We recommend tracking all three simultaneously and prioritizing whichever model your target buyers actually use.

Q4: What happens if competitors see this data and copy our strategy?

Visibility isn't zero-sum. Multiple brands can appear in the same AI answer—in fact, most prompts in our study surfaced 5-8 operators. The goal isn't to suppress competitors; it's to ensure you're present when relevant questions are asked. That said, early movers do gain compounding advantage: brands that establish visibility now build signal strength that's harder to displace later. If you wait for competitors to act first, you're fighting for the last spot in an already-crowded shortlist instead of anchoring the category definition.

Q5: How do we know if this is actually influencing buyer behavior, not just AI rankings?

Track three leading indicators. First, run your own prompts monthly and watch whether your visibility percentage increases. Second, ask inbound leads during discovery calls how they first heard about you—if "ChatGPT" or "I asked AI" starts appearing more frequently, you're seeing real behavior change. Third, monitor referral traffic from AI platforms in your analytics—while not all AI answers include clickable links, many do. The most direct signal is asking prospects: if they mention using AI tools during their research process, you'll know whether you were part of that conversation or absent from it.

  • Header

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam,

  • Header

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

  • Header

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.