No-code web builders have reshaped how agencies and teams design, prototype, and launch websites. Figma, the beloved design collaboration tool, recently introduced Figma Sites—a bold new feature promising to take your designs from canvas to live site within the same platform. Meanwhile, Webflow remains the go-to for professional, production-ready no-code websites.
So how do they compare? Let’s break it down across core workflows, strengths, and real-world use cases to help you pick the right tool for your next project.
Figma Sites vs Webflow: Comparison Table
This table breaks down key decision points between Figma Sites and Webflow, including which types of users and website pages each platform is best suited for.
Need help choosing between Figma Sites and Webflow? We help startups and creative teams build scalable, no-code websites with the right tools for their goals. Let's talk about your project. Book a free strategy call.
1. Design & Prototyping
- Figma Sites
- Extends your existing Figma files—no need to learn a separate interface.
- Leverages Figma’s vector networks, auto-layout, and components for responsive design.
- Changes to design and layout are instantaneous; ideal for rapid iteration.
- Webflow
- Visual CSS/HTML editor that mirrors production output—what you build is what you ship.
- Powerful auto-layout features (Flexbox, Grid) alongside traditional CSS controls.
- Built-in responsive breakpoints and designer-focused style panels.
Bottom Line: If your team lives in Figma and you want frictionless hand-off, Figma Sites shines. If you need granular control over production HTML/CSS semantics, Webflow remains unmatched.
2. CMS & Content Management
Content is central to most websites—how each platform handles it is a major differentiator.
- Figma Sites
- No CMS support yet but discussion have been made.
- Best for 1 page site where data structures are lightweight.
- Webflow
- Robust CMS out of the box—Collections, nested references, multi-item filtering.
- Rich editor interface for clients; granular permissions and content staging.
- Strong API for external integrations (e.g., headless, e-commerce).
Bottom Line: For sites with dynamic content, blogs, or client-managed updates, Webflow’s CMS is far more robust. Figma Sites works best for static or design-led use cases—for now.
3. Interactions & Animations
Web animation is no longer a nice-to-have—it’s a core part of modern web experiences.
- Figma Sites
- Relies on Figma’s prototyping interactions (e.g., smart animate, overlays).
- Limited control over scroll-based triggers, complex timelines, or 3D transforms.
- Webflow
- Advanced Interaction Designer: scroll-triggered animations, timed sequences, Lottie integration.
- Ability to fine-tune easing, duration, and iterative animations per element.
Bottom Line: If you’re building immersive landing pages or want refined transitions, Webflow’s interaction toolkit offers the creative depth you’ll need. Figma Sites is ideal for simple transitions and UX demos.
4. Performance & Hosting
Fast-loading websites aren’t just nice—they’re expected. Here’s how both tools handle speed and reliability.
- Figma Sites
- Hosted on Figma’s infrastructure; performance details are emerging.
- Assets pulled directly from Figma’s servers—image optimization workflows are basic.
- Webflow
- Fast CDN-backed hosting, global edge network, automatic SVG and image optimization.
- In-app audits (built by Lighthouse) for performance scoring; custom code injection possible.
Bottom Line: For mission-critical sites where load time and scalability matter, Webflow’s hosting setup is more mature and performance-optimized. Figma Sites still prioritizes simplicity over advanced optimization.
5. SEO & Custom Code
Search visibility and flexibility for integrations can make or break a site’s success.
- Figma Sites
- Meta titles/descriptions and basic SEO controls available.
- Limited ability to inject custom scripts or structured data.
- Webflow
- Full SEO control: custom <head> tags, 301 redirects, sitemap management, schema markup.
- Custom code embeds at page or site level; advanced tag manager support.
Bottom Line: If SEO plays a significant role in your strategy—or if you’re working with marketing teams—Webflow is far more accommodating. Figma Sites handles the essentials but lacks the depth for advanced use cases.
6. Pricing & Scalability
Cost matters, especially when scaling across multiple clients, editors, or project types.
- Figma Sites
- Currently in open beta; pricing TBD but expected to follow Figma’s per-editor model plus site hosting fees.
- Best for teams already on Figma Professional/Organization plans.
- Webflow
- Site plans start at USD 14/month for basic sites; CMS, Business, and Enterprise tiers available.
- Account plans for multiple projects; team seats unlock collaboration features.
Bottom Line: If you’re planning multiple sites or have clients managing their own pages, Webflow’s pricing is predictable and scalable. Figma Sites could be more affordable for lightweight, in-house projects—depending on how hosting is priced.
7. Ecosystem & Community
A thriving community can speed up learning, spark inspiration, and fill in gaps with templates or support.
- Figma Sites
- Access to Figma Community for templates, UI kits, and plugins.
- Growing but nascent user group around live-site publishing within Figma.
- Webflow
- Vast community: hundreds of templates, UI kits, coded components, and official Webflow University tutorials.
- Active forums, meetups, and partner directory for agency referrals.
Bottom Line: Webflow’s ecosystem is battle-tested; Figma Sites will leverage Figma’s community but is just getting started for published sites.
Conclusion
Figma Sites marks a significant step toward a unified design-to-web workflow—especially for internal teams and small-scale projects. But when it comes to production-ready, scalable, and SEO-optimized websites, Webflow still offers unmatched depth and flexibility.
Each platform has its place. The key is aligning your tool choice with the project complexity, team structure, and long-term needs.
Curious about Figma Sites? We're launching a dedicated offering for fast, design-to-live websites built entirely in Figma. Perfect for portfolios, launches, and event pages.See Our Figma Sites Offering
常见问题
1. What’s the biggest advantage of Figma Sites over Webflow?
Figma Sites lets you go live directly from your Figma canvas—no hand-off or “re‐build” step—so it’s ideal for teams that want one unified design-to-publish experience.
2. Can I export clean HTML/CSS from Figma Sites?
Not yet. Figma Sites publishes your design but doesn’t expose raw code for download; Webflow, by contrast, lets you export production-ready HTML/CSS/JS.
3. Which platform has a shallower learning curve?
Designers already familiar with Figma will pick up Figma Sites almost instantly. Webflow has more features, so there’s a steeper ramp for non-developers.
4. Which is better for simple websites: Figma Sites or Webflow?
Figma Sites is great for fast, simple sites built directly from your designs. Webflow offers more flexibility but may be more than you need for basic pages.
5. How do hosting and performance compare?
Webflow uses a global CDN with built-in image optimization and performance audits. Figma Sites is hosted on Figma’s infrastructure—fast, but with fewer user-configurable optimizations so far.
6. Can I use custom JavaScript or third-party embeds in Figma Sites?
Custom code support is limited in Figma Sites today. If you need complex embeds, widgets, or head-tag scripts, Webflow provides far more flexibility.
7. How does pricing compare?
Webflow itemizes site and account plans (from USD 14/mo up to Enterprise). Figma Sites pricing is still being finalized but will likely piggy-back on existing Figma editor fees plus a hosting charge.
8. Can I edit content myself?
Webflow gives non-technical user the ability to update content via a form format interface while Figma Sites still uses a whiteboarding interface which can be daunting for non-technical users.
